![]() For 3/4 and 6/8, I use 96 row patterns generally.Īnyone care to comment on the nerdseq?I have it, and I love it. For an easy way of doing swing and shuffle, I copy-paste a pattern of speed changes (4-slow 4-fast for jazz swing and shuffle, 2-slow-2-fast for funk 16th swing). Impulse Tracker doesn't have the matrix view (only the pattern sequencer), so pretty much all the song arrangement is done using copy-paste. If it's 4 bars or more, it's simply spread over multiple patterns (which means that I often have blocks of 4 patterns that contain more or less one song section). If I have repeating stuff 1 bar or shorter, I just repeat it using the block copy/repeat tool. The faster speed is good for staccato, hammer-ons, 6-tuples, fast rising string line scales, trills etc. and so on) playing together.In Impulse Tracker, I like to use 64 row patterns with 8 rows per beat as well (2 bars per pattern). a 2 bar long beat, a 4 bar long bassline, an 8 bar long lead, a 16 bar long pad. No matter how much I gel with trackers, I'm still so used to piano rolls and clips, having sequences of various lengths (i.e. I wonder sometimes if the ticks are an absolute limit on the granularity of the line delay commands. That's my impression of what's going on in Renoise, but I guess could be incorrect about some relationships and resolution impacts. < that's the same as an old MPC.Ī DLY command is a way to have a single line subdivided into 256 levels of granularity.Īnd while a higher LPB also provides a higher granularity of resolution, it also increases visual length. So 8 Lines Per Beat at 12 ticks per Line is a resolution of 96 ppqn. you generally want to decide on the songs main LPB setting early, because it will increase the cycle speed of all existing patterns and do it against the base tempo, when you start to change it afterwards.Ĥ Lines Per Beat at 12 ticks per Line is a resolution of 48 ppqn. If I wanted to set a patterns length to 16 lines in length, instead of 64 which is part of my standard setting, then that is one bar and a quarter of the screen real estate but also then only one bar as opposed to 4 bars in length with the same settings. phrases have the advantage of this DLY parameter being able to be entered by a control slider. and those offset delays seem to be capable of 256 levels of granularity. but when recording live midi into Renoise, it seems to include recording the timing offset DLY Delay parameter at an offset value as you do. ![]() The pattern will be much longer visually. That should then be equivalent to a live recordable midi resolution of 384 ppqn. So if I changed it to this, I’d have 8 times the pattern length and 8 times the resolution.Īnd the Renoise preference for the pattern length default set to 512 It should be equivalent to a ppqn tick resolution of 4 X 12. That’s basically what I start with as a standard 4 bar pattern. The song option tick per line setting of 12Īnd the Renoise preference for the pattern length default set to 64 what doesn’t take up screen space is the DLY and the Song Options tick resolution. So basically what can take up screen real estate when seeking higher timing resolutions, is the LPB of the Song and the Pattern length. Phrases have an added slider for (DLY) values (DLY) is an individual lines delay setting and can be used for 256 positive sub divisions of each line. Instrument phrases are subject to the Song Options ticks per line setting as well. The (LPB) Lines per beat, and the pattern length are always visible lines on screen. The ticks per line are always invisible sub units within each line. Renoise Main Pages - Pattern Length can be from 1 to 512 lines. Renoise Main Pages - LPB default is usually 4 Lines Per Beat. ![]() Renoise Song Options - Ticks per line default is 12. Or maybe I'm missing something? I don't know, is there a way to display a phrase in the main pattern editor? Or is it possible to show several Phrase editors at once? but losing the ability to view and edit everything on the same page somehow defeat tracker efficiency. phrases are the closest thing in Renoise to Live's clips. a long one helps visualizing long, evolving sequences more easily it seems. but I have to spend more time on Renoise's Pattern Matrix then. ![]() a sequence of short patterns seems pretty nice to keep a clear overview on what's going on. ![]() Quick Renoise workflow question: for a same loop, would you guys favor a sequence of short patterns or a long one? Phrases? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |